Chennai

Dr Neela Kannan, who is claiming refund towards the purchase of a flat from Selene Estate Limited, had approached the authority with a complaint. As another complaint pertaining to the similar issue is pending with the State consumer disputes redressal commission, the authority returned the complaint initially.

However, the complainant submitted that the remedies available to the homebuyers under the Consumer Protection Act and RERA Act are concurrent remedies and cited orders issued by the Supreme Court to resubmit the complaint.

“The complaint before the State consumer commission is admittedly not yet disposed of. The complaint before the consumer commission and the present complaint before TNRERA are under different enactments. Apart from this, the RERA Act also makes it clear that the application of the provisions of the Act are in addition to and not in derogation of other laws,” observed the adjudicating officer of TNRERA G Saravanan.

While ordering to number the complaint filed by Neela Kannan, Saravanan also held that the complaint filed before TNRERA under RERA Act is maintainable. Earlier, Selene Estate Limited had contended against the maintainability of the complaint and requested the Authority to dismiss the complaint.

Visit news.dtnext.in to explore our interactive epaper!

Download the DT Next app for more exciting features!

Click here for iOS

Click here for Android