This is thought to be the first time a magazine has published a cover image of a woman breastfeeding in the country. But the fact that the model is not herself a mother has caused some discomfort and generated debate. Grihalakshmi’s editor said the magazine wanted to raise awareness about the need for mothers to be able to breastfeed in public. “A month ago, a man shared a picture of his wife breastfeeding on Facebook to start a conversation about letting mothers feed in public spaces. But the result was that the woman was subjected to cyber-bullying from both men and women,” Moncy Joseph told the BBC’s Ashraf Padanna “That is why we decided to dedicate our latest issue to breastfeeding mothers.” 

Many women in India who wear the traditional sari breastfeed in public, using the garment as a means of covering themselves. But this option is not available to women who do not want to wear the sari.

Many people posted on social media in support of both the magazine and the mode. “To some it’s gross, to some it’s a free show. To a child, it’s unquestionably simple and necessary. To anyone smart in enough, it’s natural,” wrote Twitterati Shreya Teresita. But the campaign has also drawn criticism for featuring a model rather than an actual breastfeeding mother. 

“That point at which you decided to push a real mother actually breastfeeding her child into the inner pages and portray a model holding a baby to her bare breast on your cover is where you delved into cheap sensationalism and exploitation,” wrote blogger Anjana Nayar in a blog post. But Gilu Joseph has defended her decision to pose for the magazine cover.