His Lordship, Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Former Chief Justice of India was appointed as Professor of Emeritus at SRM School of Law.  
Chennai

SRM School of Law appoints ex-CJI UU Lalit as Professor Emeritus

He also discussed key rulings that have defined the scope of parliamentary privileges in India.

DTNEXT Bureau

CHENNAI: The SRM Institute of Science and Technology’s School of Law appointed former Chief Justice of India Uday Umesh Lalit as Professor Emeritus.

One of the few jurists to be elevated directly from the bar to the Supreme Court, Justice Lalit has played a pivotal role in shaping modern Indian legal discourse through landmark rulings on individual rights, gender justice, and institutional accountability, including being part of the Constitution Bench in Shayara Bano v. Union of India, which declared instant triple talaq unconstitutional, and the ruling in Joseph Shine v. Union of India, which struck down the offence of adultery, reaffirming the values of dignity, equality and personal autonomy.

During his visit to the SRMIST campus, Justice Lalit delivered a lecture on the constitutional basis and contemporary relevance of ‘Parliamentary Privileges’, tracing their origin to the evolution of the British Parliament and how they were adopted and adapted within the Indian constitutional framework.

“Parliamentary privileges are not personal advantages, but institutional safeguards designed to preserve the dignity, independence, and effectiveness of legislative bodies,” Justice Lalit noted.

Referring to Article 194 of the Constitution, which deals with the powers, privileges and immunities of State Legislatures, he noted that while the Constitution lays down the framework, the contours of these privileges have been shaped over time through judicial interpretation. He underlined the need to view legislative privileges in harmony with fundamental rights and constitutional principles.

He also discussed key rulings that have defined the scope of parliamentary privileges in India. Referring to MSM Sharma v. Sri Krishna Sinha, he highlighted the tension between legislative privilege and freedom of the press. He also cited Tej Kiran Jain v. N Sanjiva Reddy, which upheld immunity for statements made by legislators within the House.

MNM to skip 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly polls, extend unconditional support to DMK alliance

After Zomato, Swiggy hikes platform fee by 17 pc to Rs 17.58 per order

Activists oppose development plans at Ooty Race Course

Vaishnaw announces new refund slabs; no refund for cancellation up to 8 hours before departure

LA28 unveils a bold, superbloom-inspired look for the Los Angeles Olympics