The reports are dire. The dollar’s days of dominance are rapidly coming to an end, thanks to US economic and political dysfunction. China is plotting to displace the dollar and rally the world around the idea that its centrality in the global financial system hurts everyone else. Even American allies are shying away from the dollar now that the US is becoming more antagonistic toward other countries.
This narrative is plausible, logical and ostensibly supported by data. But it is false. The dollar remains secure on its pedestal. The reason, though, is less the power of US exceptionalism and more the weaknesses of America’s rivals and allies.
The perception that the dollar is stumbling is partly the result of Washington appearing to undermine its own currency’s standing. The US government continues to run large budget deficits while debt keeps climbing. Over time, this should raise concerns about the value of Treasury securities, which are widely considered among the safest and most trusted financial assets. At the same time, the US political system has shown increasing dysfunction. Periodic threats of debt defaults and erratic fiscal policymaking have unsettled investors. Washington has also used the dollar’s dominance in global payments as a strategic tool, restricting the international trade of rivals such as Iran and Russia. Access to the dollar and the US banking system is crucial for cross-border payments, and losing that access can severely constrain a country’s economic activity. At times, even allies have faced such pressure.
President Trump has launched a frontal attack on the independence of the Federal Reserve, which is responsible for maintaining the dollar’s value by tamping down inflation. Trump and his enablers are eroding checks and balances that keep economic and trade policies from going off the rails. Assaults on the rule of law have become the norm, leaving central banks and other international investors wondering if they can count on being able to reliably repatriate their dollar assets.
The dollar’s dominance means that volatile US policies and financial market problems infect the entire world, adding instability to an already volatile situation.
Small wonder that other countries are desperate to “de-risk” by reducing their exposure to the dollar and promoting alternatives. But for all the talk of diversification away from the dollar, though, the reality is quite different. The dollar may have lost ground modestly in some respects, but it still dominates international reserves (it makes up central banks’ rainy day funds) and payments.
China’s central bank and others are indeed buying more gold for their reserves, while China’s reported holdings of Treasuries seem to have fallen sharply. That certainly bolsters the narrative of dollar decline. At the same time, countries like Belgium, Britain and Canada have ramped up their reported holdings of Treasuries. There’s a connection: Reports indicate that China is routing its holdings through custodial accounts in some of those countries, which hardly means Beijing is ditching the dollar.
Overall, foreign investors’ holdings of Treasuries have, in fact, increased by $650 billion since Trump took office, not much different from the increases in the two previous years. Even foreign central banks added nearly $70 billion to their stash. So the world is still buying copious amounts of “safe” dollar assets even as those assets look riskier.
Technology, in theory, ought to assist the shift away from the dollar. China has issued a digital renminbi, and the European Central Bank plans to issue a digital euro in 2029. The US has no plans to issue a digital dollar, which some argue puts the dollar at a disadvantage. China has beefed up its payment systems and made it easier to use the renminbi in international transactions. Russia and China can now directly exchange rubles and renminbi, without having to use the dollar as an intermediating currency.
In reality, the dollar’s share of global payments has held firm at close to 60% in recent years. A digital renminbi and a digital euro are hardly going to alter the balance. A currency’s availability in digital rather than physical form will make it more convenient to use but will hardly change the trust that domestic residents and foreigners have in that currency. China’s renminbi has gained some traction in international transactions, but it still accounts for a tiny global share.
Beijing wants to elevate the renminbi’s prominence in international finance. But despite domestic and external pressure on the Chinese government to loosen up capital controls and relax management of the renminbi’s exchange rate, Beijing so far appears unwilling to do so. If foreign investors cannot move freely into and out of renminbi assets, or count on an exchange rate freely determined by market forces rather than government control, they will shy away from those assets. China’s institutional framework, including a court system and central bank that are under the thumb of the Communist Party, hardly inspires confidence among international investors.
The eurozone has economic heft, but its financial system is highly fragmented. Major European economies and others like Britain and Japan face slow growth, high debt levels and other sorts of economic malaise. So when exporters, importers, investors and central banks go looking for a safe place to park their funds and for a currency they can use easily and with few constraints, they still mostly turn to the dollar.
Thus, the real question is whether other countries are going to set their economic and financial houses in order and do what’s needed to improve their own institutions. Without that, they will remain at the mercy of the dollar, with only themselves to blame.
The New York Times