Summon CM Vijay, ministers to probe Veeramani case charges, urges DMK

In his complaint on Sunday, Baalu alleged that the three had made public accusations against the DMK in connection with the case and said their statements warranted an SIT investigation.
DMK treasurer and Lok Sabha floor leader T R Baalu
DMK treasurer and Lok Sabha floor leader T R Baalu
Updated on: 

CHENNAI: DMK treasurer and Lok Sabha floor leader TR Baalu has petitioned the Special Investigation Team (SIT) investigating the Veeramani Pocso case, urging it to summon Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay and Ministers Adhav Arjuna and R Nirmalkumar for questioning and to obtain the evidence they allegedly possess.

In his complaint on Sunday, Baalu alleged that the three had made public accusations against the DMK in connection with the case and said their statements warranted an SIT investigation.

Baalu said Chief Minister Vijay had publicly alleged on September 25 that the DMK had protected Veeramani. On the same day, minister Adhav Arjuna allegedly accused the DMK of not only protecting Veeramani but also of improperly closing the case against him.

The following day, September 26, Law Minister Nirmalkumar allegedly accused the DMK of receiving Rs 500 crore from Veeramani in return for protecting him, Baalu said in his complaint.

DMK treasurer and Lok Sabha floor leader T R Baalu
Veeramani Pocso case: DMK's overreaction raises doubts, says Nirmalkumar

According to Baalu, the allegations were false and intended to defame the DMK and its leaders; that the three possessed crucial information or evidence relating to the alleged offence but had not handed it over to the investigating officer as required under the Pocso Act; or that they had obtained investigation-related information from the case diary through unauthorised means and disclosed it publicly.

Baalu said the allegations made by the Chief Minister and the two Ministers were directly connected with the SIT investigation. He therefore urged the investigating agency to immediately obtain from them the evidence, documents and information forming the basis of their allegations.

He also sought answers to whether the three possessed supporting evidence, why such evidence, if available, had not been handed over to the investigators, whether they had obtained confidential investigation documents without authorisation and whether information from such documents had been disclosed publicly.

Baalu urged the SIT to summon all three and to conduct an inquiry into the allegations and the sources of the information they cited.

X

DT Next
www.dtnext.in