Armament strategy: After tanks for Kyiv, are jets next in line?

MOSCOW: Kyiv scored a major coup last week in convincing Western allies — particularly a reluctant Germany — to send modern battle tanks to help fight off Russia. Ukraine now seems emboldened to renew its calls for fighter jets. Such pleas have fallen upon deaf ears up to now. Could that be about to change? Kyiv has been asking for fighter jets since soon after Russia launched its full-scale invasion last February. After the change of heart on tanks last week, Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksii Reznikov told Canadian broadcaster CBC he was optimistic that allies could supply jets. These would be a “game changer,” Reznikov said, adding that he expected intense discussions in the coming weeks. Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany, Oleksii Makeiev, told DW in an interview on Monday that his country hadn’t requested Berlin to provide any fighter jets — yet.

Exactly which planes Kyiv would want and how many is not yet clear. Ukraine’s deputy foreign minister, Andriy Melnyk, called recently for “a powerful fighter jet coalition for Ukraine,” comprising US-made F-16s and F-35s, Eurofighter, Tornado, Rafale and Gripen warplanes.

F-16s are of particular interest, because many European countries are looking to replace these with newer F-35s, German Marshall Fund senior fellow Bruno Lete told DW. “Unfortunately for Ukraine, many of the fighter jets that they had were destroyed in the very beginning of the military campaign in February 2022,” he said, adding that the remaining ones are old, a mix from Soviet times. From Kyiv’s perspective, fighter jets are the missing component of a full arsenal, according to Lete.

Washington, Kyiv’s biggest military backer in real terms, had previously opposed sending fighter jets. President Joe Biden said Monday he wouldn’t provide them. Last March, the White House said allies providing Soviet-era MiG-29 aircraft, as requested by Kyiv, would not make a huge difference. Moreover such a move “could result in significant Russian reaction that might increase the prospects of a military escalation with NATO,” said John Kirby, then the spokesperson for the US Department of Defense.

However, citing unnamed sources, news outlet Politico recently reported that some US military officials supported the transfer and were trying to convince Defense Department officials. The US also previously said it wouldn’t send main battle tanks, and then changed its mind. German Chancellor Olaf Scholz has repeatedly shot down the prospect of Berlin sending jets in the past week. On Sunday, Scholz said that what was needed at present was a serious debate, not “a bidding competition... in which perhaps domestic political motives play a bigger role than support for Ukraine,” dpa news agency reported.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Monday that “nothing is ruled out” in principle, but deliveries would have to be useful, given the long training time for such aircraft, and must not escalate the conflict, in comments carried by The Associated Press. Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte similarly said there were “no taboos” in terms of what could be delivered, but that sending fighter jets would indeed be a massive step forward, AP reported.

The reason Western allies have resisted sending fighter jets is because it increases Ukraine’s ability to encroach onto Russian territory. “It’s a very sensitive issue here to give that, because it would make it much more easy for Ukraine to actually attack targets inside Russia,” Lete explained.