STRIKING A BALANCE: Virus sheds light on need for biodiversity

One theory is it first appeared at a market where live and freshly killed animals are sold in the city of Wuhan, in China’s Hubei province. As increasingly dense human populations continue to encroach on the habitats of other animals, scientists fear the risk of deadly viruses being transmitted between species will grow. The number of annual outbreaks of infectious diseases has tripled every year since 1980.

No infectious disease has spread so quickly across the globe as the novel coronavirus, and there is much debate about how to prevent worldwide outbreaks of infectious diseases in the future. This pandemic has once again drawn attention to the disastrous decline in biodiversity, and this has been a particularly important subject for politicians and scientists this week. May 22 was proclaimed International Day for Biological Diversity by the UN.

Originally scheduled to be held in China in the fall, this year’s meeting of signatories to the UN Convention on Biological Diversity has been postponed because of the pandemic. Nonetheless, the signatory governments are still discussing ways on how to meet the global commitment agreed to in January to protect at least 30% of the planet’s oceans and land by 2030 in order to minimise the decline in biodiversity. The UN has also now called for a ban on live animal markets such as the one in Wuhan where the novel coronavirus may have emerged.

German Environment Minister Svenja Schulze, a Social Democrat, has another priority. “China reacted immediately and closed the dangerous markets,” she said. “What’s important from a European point of view is that the wild animal trade, which is largely illegal, be suppressed. We have to act against the criminals. This is the job of the police and customs officers. We’re working on it.” Christoph Thies, the forests and climate campaigner for Greenpeace Germany, had a similar point of view. “We cannot expect people to stop eating meat from wild animals overnight,” he said. “There are regions where it’s an important part of people’s food.”

Thies said he hoped that biodiversity would once again receive the attention it deserves and that the environment and nature would be examined in the context of climate change. At the Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro in 1992, where the Convention on Biological Diversity was signed, the subject was considered as important as desertification and climate change. In the following decades, however, climate change became the main talking point. The three topics are intricately interconnected, Thies said: “Restoring forests and other ecosystems can help to contribute to 20-30% of what is needed to meet goals regarding climate change.”

“In many countries, in many governments, the people who deal with biodiversity and protecting nature often have little to do with people dealing with climate change,” Thies said. Germany only has about 10% of the number of partridges and lapwings that it had 25 years ago, according to a report published by the Environment Ministry in May. Globally, about 35% of invertebrate pollinators, such as bees and butterflies, face extinction, the UN reports.

“There has been some improvement in the beech forests, and with the birds, in cities, in the forests, but the situation regarding agricultural land is really critical “ Schulze said. “What we now call insecticide is happening. We say that in our report. More has to be done about this.”