Begin typing your search...

    ASI denies delaying Keeladi excavation report, calls media claims ‘misleading’

    In an official statement, the ASI said it follows a rigorous and well-established process for the publication of excavation reports.

    ASI denies delaying Keeladi excavation report, calls media claims ‘misleading’
    X
    File photo of the Keeladi excavation

    CHENNAI: The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) on Thursday firmly denied allegations that it is intentionally delaying the publication of the excavation report on the Keezhadi site in Sivaganga district, Tamil Nadu, calling recent media reports on the issue “misleading and untrue.”

    In an official statement, the ASI said it follows a rigorous and well-established process for the publication of excavation reports.

    “The Archaeological Survey of India regularly publishes reports of excavated sites under the aegis of the Director General. Each report undergoes vetting by subject experts, followed by revisions from the excavators before final publication as part of the ‘Memoirs of the Archaeological Survey of India (MASI), ‘” said Nandini Bhattacharya, Joint Director General of ASI.

    She clarified that the same procedure was followed for the Keezhadi excavation report.

    “The draft report was reviewed by experts, and their suggestions were shared with the excavator. However, the excavator has not made the necessary corrections to the draft so far, “she added.

    Bhattacharya strongly rejected suggestions that the ASI is disinterested in publishing the Keezhadi findings.

    “The claim that ASI is not keen on releasing the report is a complete fabrication. Every excavation involves significant investment and effort, and the ASI is deeply committed to documenting and publishing its results. Allegations to the contrary aim to wrongly tarnish the department’s image,” she said.

    The ASI also described as routine a recent letter from the Director (Excavations and Explorations) to the Keezhadi excavator.

    “Such correspondence is standard practice and should not be misinterpreted, “Bhattacharya noted.

    Urging responsible reporting, she added, “We request the media to understand the complexities involved in archaeological research and publication, and not rush to conclusions without verifying facts.”

    Highly placed sources within the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) have revealed to DT Next that the excavator of the Keezhadi archaeological site has declined to incorporate the revisions suggested by subject experts into the draft excavation report.

    “Despite being formally advised to make the necessary corrections as part of the standard vetting process, the excavator has submitted a detailed written response defending his original findings and methodology, thereby standing by the initial version of the report, “sources said.

    K Amarnath Ramakrishna, the lead excavator and a key figure behind the Keezhadi excavation, he declined to comment on the matter.

    DTNEXT Bureau
    Next Story