Begin typing your search...

Ramalinga Raju, 5 others told to return unlawful gain of Rs 624 cr

The amount has to be paid along with an annual interest of 12 per cent from January 7, 2009 till the date of payment, according to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi).

Ramalinga Raju, 5 others told to return unlawful gain of Rs 624 cr
X
B Ramalinga Raju

NEW DELHI: In the 14-year-old Satyam Computer Services case, market watchdog Sebi has directed the erstwhile company’s founder B Ramalinga Raju, four individuals and an entity to disgorge unlawful gains worth over Rs 624 crore.

Sebi has also barred Ramalinga Raju and Rama Raju from the securities markets for nearly five years but the directions will be subject to the Supreme Court’s decision on the pending appeals filed by the two individuals.

The scam at Satyam Computer Services came to light on January 7, 2009, when Ramalinga Raju, then the company’s chairman, admitted to manipulating the company’s accounts. Sebi’s probe revealed that the individuals traded in the company’s shares during the period from January 2001 to December 2008 when in possession of unpublished price sensitive information about the firm’s adverse financial position.

In a 96-page order, dated November 30, Sebi directed Ramalinga Raju, Rama Raju, B Suryanarayan Raju, V Srinivas, G Ramakrishna and SRSR Holdings to disgorge the unlawful gains totalling Rs 624.09 crore. The amount has to be paid along with an annual interest of 12 per cent from January 7, 2009 till the date of payment, according to the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi). The latest order came after the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT), in June this year, asked the regulator to pass a fresh order on or before November 30.

In February this year, SAT set aside two orders by Sebi in October and November 2018 in the case with respect to calculation of the unlawful gains and certain other aspects. ‘‘I find that imposition of simple interest on illegal gains at the rate of 12 per cent from January 7, 2009 till date of payment, is neither arbitrary nor excessive by any standard.

DTNEXT Bureau
Next Story