Country facing terrorism but entire population of J-K cannot be confined: Azad to SC

He said the government claims that prohibitory orders under section 144 of CrPC have been withdrawn from all police stations in Jammu and Kashmir but there are no such withdrawal orders in public domain.

A bench of Justices N V Ramana, R Subhash Reddy and B R Gavai reserved its verdict on pleas filed by Azad and Kashmir Times Editor Anuradha Bhasin challenging the curbs imposed in the erstwhile state.

The top court observed that it needs to create a balance between the rights of citizens and the national security of the state.

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for Azad said that the statistics submitted by the state administration to claim return of normalcy was far from the ground reality and the top court has to decide the validity of the restrictions on the basis of legal principles.

"This country is facing the problem of terrorism. No one can deny this fact. We have to deal with this situation together. But, this does not mean that you can paralyse entire seven million people of the state," he said.

Referring to prohibitory orders, Sibal said that nowhere it has been stated in the orders of magistrate that restrictions have been imposed on the ground of national security.

"Not a single order of magistrate on section 144 said that the restrictions are being imposed on account of national security. No where it is reflected in the orders nor it relies on the statistics. The section 144 order only speaks of law and order situation," he said, while contradicting the arguments.

Sibal said that Jammu and Kashmir administration has contended that situation is fast returning to normalcy and prohibitory orders have been lifted from all the police stations except for the night time.

He said that no order has been brought on record to show that prohibitory orders have been withdrawn and court must accept the contention only on affidavit.

"Security personnel in Jammu and Kashmir know the mischief makers. They can identify them but there cannot be any section 144 order for keeping in confine seven million people of the state. They have to pass the test of reasonableness laid down by the apex court," he added.

Sibal concluded his arguments saying that it's not about past but for the future of the people of Jammu and Kashmir that top court has to decide the matter and courts are the custodian of rights of the people.

Advocate Vrinda Grover, appearing for Bhasin termed the curbs "unconstitutional" and said the restrictions have to pass the test of proportionality.

She said that Jammu and Kashmir administration reference to prohibitory orders has no application of mind and are vague.

The bench then asked the petitioners and Jammu and Kashmir administration to file the written submission as early as possible and reserved the verdict.

On Tuesday, the Jammu and Kashmir administration had justified imposition of curbs on Internet services in the erstwhile state after abrogation of the special status given under Article 370, saying separatists, terrorists and Pakistan's Army made attempts on social media to instigate people for 'jihad'.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, appearing for Jammu and Kashmir administration, had said that it was not only fighting enemies within but also with those from across the border.

Mehta referred to public speeches and social media posts of former Jammu and Kashmir chief minister Mehbooba Mufti and leaders of National Conference party against the removal of Article 35A, which gave special rights to permanent residents of the state, and Article 370 provisions that granted special status to the state.

Referring to social media app Twitter, Mehta said that "there were thousands of messages on official twitter handles of Pakistan Army, Afghan Taliban and other terror groups meant to instigate the people of Jammu and Kashmir. There was propaganda by Pakistan Army. We would have failed in our duty, if we had not taken precautionary steps".

On November 21, the Centre justified restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of provisions of Article 370 and said that due to the preventive steps taken, neither a single life was lost nor a single bullet fired.

The Centre had referred to terror violence in the Kashmir Valley and said that for the past so many years terrorists were being pushed through from across the border, local militant and separatist organisation had held the civilians captive in the region and it would have been "foolish" if the government would not have taken preventive steps to secure the lives of citizens.