'Termination clause in N-deal with Japan not binding on India'

The just-signed historic civil nuclear deal with Japan has a ‘termination’ clause which the government insists is not binding on India but merely records the ‘views’ of the Japanese side considering its ‘special sensitivities’.
'Termination clause in N-deal with Japan not binding on India'
Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe

New Delhi

The government insisted that India has made ‘no additional commitments’ over the similar agreements signed with the US and other countries. In the Nuclear Cooperation Agreement, signed in the presence of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Japanese counterpart Shinzo Abe in Tokyo on Friday, there is a note on 'Views and Understanding' wherein the Japanese side has cited India's September 2008 declaration of unilateral moratorium on atomic tests and said if this commitment is violated, the deal will terminate.
Indian government holds that this is merely recording of the views of the two sides. "The termination clause is there in other NCAs (nuclear cooperation agreements) we have signed, including with the US (Article 14). However the circumstances triggering a possible termination are never sharply defined. Consideration also has to be given to mitigating factors," a source said.
"That note is simply a record by the negotiators of respective views on certain issues. It is not the NCA which is what is binding," the source said. The sources added that given Japan's special sensitivities as the only nation to have suffered a nuclear attack, "it was felt that their views should be recorded in a separate Note. The Note is a record by the negotiators of respective views on certain issues.
"It states, on the one hand, what could be Japan's views in advance on what is a hypothetical situation; that is their national prerogative. At the same time it also records India’s position on the same issue, which is a reiteration of the September 2008 commitments. No change is envisaged from those commitments and no, repeat no, additional commitments have been made by India." "On termination, there is no change from the US template," the source added.
The nuclear agreement with Japan "follows the same template (as the US) but compresses the developments which have taken place since 2007. It reflects commitments which were made at the time of the NSG waiver in 2008, many of which were unilateral in nature," according to the source.
The four steps of the Indo-US deal which have been compressed and captured into a single stage are – 123 agreement (2007), NSG waiver (2008), Reprocessing pact (2010) and Administrative mechanisms (2013), sources said. The sources maintained that the views of Japan, 'on when they can ask for it', is 'their national prerogative'.
Japan has made a major exception by signing the atomic cooperation agreement with India, despite it being non-signatory to the Nucl

Related Stories

No stories found.