GE concerned over ‘lack’ of sustainable N-regulatory milieu

While Indian officials do admit that there has been a “lukewarm” response by GE, they played down its concerns saying the company does not have a reference plant, a pre-requisite to go ahead with the project. GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy, one of the two US companies, is supposed to build six reactors in India. 

When contacted, Banmali Agrawala, President and CEO for GE South Asia, told PTI “GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy believes the path forward requires a sustainable regulatory environment, which would include a nuclear liability law that channels liability to plant operators consistent with global best practices. 

“We continue to have a strong interest in providing our technology to India for the eventual construction of multiple ESBWRs (Economic Simplified Boiling Water Reactor).” However, Agrawala asserted that though Indian government has taken several steps including establishing a Nuclear Insurance Pool to address the concerns of the foreign collaborators, the law required more “clarity”. 

“After all it is the law that prevails and not the clarification (referring to the FAQs),” he said. The Civil Liability Nuclear Damage Act (CNLD) 2010 was passed by Parliament two years after the historic civil nuclear cooperation agreement between the US and India. 

Foreign suppliers have raised concerns about the Right to Recourse under the Act which they feel is “ambiguous”. However, Indian officials said the GE was raising these concerns as they do not have a reference plant, without which it cannot go ahead with the setting up reactors in the country. 

“They (GE) should furnish a reference plant by the time negotiations are sealed,” a senior government official said. Department of Atomic Energy has also asked other foreign collaborators like the French company EDF and US’ WestingHouse to provide them with information on their reference plant, he said. 

Following the concerns raised by foreign suppliers, India also ratified Convention of Supplementary Compensation for Nuclear Damage, marking an important step in addressing matters related to civil nuclear liabilities earlier this year. India has been, to a large extent, able to address the concerns of the French and the Russian companies but some others like GE still insist that a strong and sustainable regulatory mechanism was required to move forward.